Interactive Legal Guide
See where sweepstakes casinos are broadly available, limited, or not currently available across all 50 US states. Click any state for dates, sources, and change notes.
Last verified April 14, 2026
Last verified: April 2026. Pending-change and legal-uncertainty states are noted in the state detail pages and tracker.
Embed this map on your site, free to use with attribution.
2 US states have signed legislation that will change sweepstakes casino legality on a future effective date. Current legal status remains in place until the date shown.
| State | Effective Date | New Status | Bill | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana | July 1, 2026 | Not available | HB 1052 | HB 1052 ban takes effect — move IN from RESTRICTED_STATES to EXPLICITLY_BANNED_STATES |
| Maine | July 5, 2026 | Not available | — | LD 2007 (Chapter 645) signed by Gov. Janet Mills on 2026-04-06 banning dual-currency online sweepstakes games. Effective ~90 days after session adjournment (est. 2026-07-05; verify against Maine 132nd Legislature adjournment). Civil penalties $10,000-$100,000 per violation. Verified 2026-04-17. |
These items are tracked as pending-change signals. They do not change the published state label until a human review confirms the effect and updates the canonical state record.
Bans sweepstakes gaming platforms in Indiana effective July 1, 2026. Civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation. Indiana Gaming Commission enforces. State lottery and peer-to-peer skill poker exempted.
Last action: Signed by Governor March 13, 2026 · Last checked: 2026-04-14 · Source
Expands Maine's gambling definition to include online sweepstakes casinos that offer virtual currencies redeemable for cash or cash equivalents. Prohibits operators from serving Maine residents and establishes penalties for violations. Effective July 2026.
Last action: Signed into law by the Governor · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Companion bills introduced in the 2026 Maryland General Assembly session directing the MLGCA to study the prevalence and economic impact of online sweepstakes casinos. The study would evaluate whether regulatory oversight is warranted and report findings to the legislature. Does not propose an outright ban.
Last action: Referred to Ways and Means Committee (House) / Budget and Taxation (Senate) · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Companion bills introduced in the Minnesota Senate and House that would define online sweepstakes casinos as a regulated form of gaming, require state licensing, and potentially restrict or prohibit their operation. The bills respond to concerns from tribal gaming operators about unregulated competition. If passed, could either create a licensing framework or result in a prohibition depending on amendments.
Last action: Referred to Commerce and Consumer Protection Committee · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Would ban online sweepstakes gaming in Ohio by amending Chapter 2915 to include virtual sweepstakes platforms within the definition of gambling devices. Backed by Ohio's licensed casino industry. If enacted, Ohio would join states like Washington and Michigan in explicitly prohibiting sweepstakes casinos.
Last action: Referred to House Criminal Justice Committee (May 2025) · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Draft legislation introduced at the request of tribal gaming interests to bring online sweepstakes platforms under Oklahoma's gambling regulatory framework. Would require state licensing or prohibit operations. Exact provisions subject to amendment.
Last action: Introduced, referred to committee (2025 session) · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Primarily targets physical "eight-liner" machines, but expands definitions of "gambling device" and "thing of value" to include gift cards and redeemable vouchers. If enacted, the broadened language could be used to challenge online sweepstakes platforms. Elevates gambling-device offenses from Class A misdemeanor to third-degree felony.
Last action: Engrossed by Senate, received in House (May 2025) · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Proposes a constitutional amendment to authorize and regulate casino gaming and sports betting in Texas, subject to voter approval. Faces strong opposition from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and conservative leadership.
Last action: Filed, referred to committee · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
House companion to SJR 82. Would require two-thirds legislative majority and a public vote. Historical precedent: similar proposals have failed repeatedly in Texas.
Last action: Filed, referred to committee · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
Proposed legislation to bring online sweepstakes platforms under Virginia's gaming regulatory framework. Would require licensing or registration with the Virginia Lottery Board. Reflects growing legislative interest in sweepstakes regulation.
Last action: Introduced, referred to committee (2025 session) · Last checked: 2026-04-11 · Source
This interactive map displays SweepState's current availability labels across all 50 US states. Colors show the broad public bucket, while the linked state pages add source lists, verification dates, change notes, and legal-uncertainty warnings when the evidence is incomplete.
Green (Available) states currently have broad sweepstakes casino availability in the canonical tracker. Players still need to check operator terms, age rules, and any state-specific notes before registering.
Amber (Limited availability)states still have restrictions, operator exclusions, or policy signals that make access less stable. Check the state page before relying on a brand's marketing copy.
Red (Not available) states are currently treated as unavailable for prize-play sweepstakes casinos. The underlying state pages explain whether that posture comes from explicit bans, enforcement, or a more limited source record.
States apply different gambling, sweepstakes, promotional, and enforcement frameworks to the same dual-currency products. SweepState therefore avoids blanket conclusions when the primary-source record is thin or the operator terms do not line up cleanly with the broader legal posture.
That patchwork is why the site tracks pending bills, scheduled transitions, operator exclusions, and source completeness separately instead of collapsing every state into an absolute yes-or-no claim.
We update this map after human review of new legislation, enforcement, or operator evidence. The tracker can flag pending changes earlier, but it does not auto-escalate a state status based on dates alone.
As of 2026, SweepState classifies California, Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, and Washington (9 states total) as states where prize-play sweepstakes casinos are not currently available.
Limited-availability states still have operator or legal limits that make access less stable. Players should check the state page, operator terms, and last-verified date before treating any platform as available.
Yes! This map is free to embed on any website. Click the 'Copy Embed Code' button to get an iframe snippet. The embed includes a link back to SweepState.com for attribution and automatically stays updated with the latest legality data.
2 states have signed laws with future effective dates: Indiana under HB 1052 on July 1, 2026; Maine on July 5, 2026. These states currently retain their existing legal status — the ban or restriction takes effect on the date listed.
Bills or tracked change items under active review include Indiana HB 1052, Maine LD 585, Maryland HB 1138 / SB 866 (2026), Minnesota SF 1423 / HF 1580, Ohio HB 298, Oklahoma SB 849, Texas SB 517, Texas SJR 82. SweepState lists them as pending-change signals rather than automatic status changes until a human review confirms the effect.
This page contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.